Why AI Generated Content Might Not Be The Best For User Engagement

[Nomad]

The primary purpose of publishing content is user engagement. Do we get same kind of user engagement with AI generated content like human generated content?
Well, you need to understand AI approaches the subject through a mechanical standpoint. Therefore, your audience might be isolated from the topic or get confused about the content. A successful content is something that relies on human touch that can align ideas in appropriate context.
What do you think?

 

[dojo]

I always create my content briefs personally (based on the logic of the topic, so semantically, and also as a gap, providing extra info' than competitors). Then ask questions and prompt ChatGPT. We do need actionable content, articles written in an active voice etc. Otherwise it's just bad quality content that will never rank or bring in leads.

 

[Teegold]

True, AI will not tailor the content according to the humans point of view. So it might not appeal to the readers emotions, leading to low user engagement.
Care should be taken on how AI should be used when it comes to creating contents.

 

[koyala]

I think you can use AI for creating content but before you use it or pubkish it, you need to rewrite it thoroughly. You need to add human touch for better reception and engagement

 

[riberet19]

I believe that human-generated content is always going to attract more audiences organically than AI-generated content, plus, if I'm not mistaken, search engines penalize AI-generated content.

 

[Teegold]

I believe that human-generated content is always going to attract more audiences organically than AI-generated content, plus, if I'm not mistaken, search engines penalize AI-generated content.

Yeah, you can just straight up generate a content with AI and expect it to do well on search engines. That is why it is important to brush it up in a way that it doesn't come off as AI at all.